Enter your email address and sign up for our announcement and updates list, Solidarity News. Get articles and upcoming events delivered every month.
Solidarity depends on the generous contributions of its friends and allies to continue its work. Please consider giving!

International Viewpoint is the monthly English-language magazine of the Fourth International. IV is a window to radical alternatives world-wide, carrying reports, analysis and debates from all corners of the globe. Correspondents in over 50 countries report on popular struggles, and the debates that are shaping the left of tomorrow.

Order these eye-catching buttons to spread the demand for social and economic justice. If you don't have paypal, email us!

Reads Bail out People, not Wall Street!. Around the edge, these 2 1/8" buttons read "Free Health Care," "Defend Public Services," "Living Wage Jobs," "Free Higher Education," "Troops Home Now," "Rebuild the Gulf Coast," and "Affordable Housing."

Brown and black buttons demand: "Bring all the Troops Home Now!" Wear one everywhere to start a conversation about why US occupation can never be a force for liberation, and people's needs should come before the massive military budget.

These 2 1/8" buttons read, in Spanish and English: ¡Alto a las deporaciones - Legalización para todos! Stop the deportations - Legalization for all!
not everything, but something
I just watched "Rethink Afghanistan."
I definitely think ec has a lot of valid criticism.
My main critique of the film is a basic lack of analysis over how the occupation began and why we're actually there. To know how to get out, we need a solid analysis that includes which forces are really holding our military there.
Clearly the film could have been more radical -- it could have been an indictment on US militarism and imperialism, it could have condemned the "war on terrorism" much more broadly.
However, I don't think Greenwald saw this film as broad political education - but rather a targeted message that we need to get US troops out of Afghanistan and Pakistan for the good of Afghanistan, Pakistan, women under occupation, US troops, long-term US interests and global stability. I think it is a useful tool for making that argument to a wide range of people in the US.
As for the NGO and think tank talking heads? Regardless of a valid critique of their structures broadly, they add credibility to the film for a less radical audiences....and it isn't necessarily the radicals that need to be convinced.
So, do I think the movie was politically right-on? No
Do I think it covers everything it should have? No
But I definitely see it as a useful tool making its point to a broad range of people. Its certainly better when it leads to discussion, and hopefully its doing that in communities across the US.