Published bimonthly since 1986, AGAINST THE CURRENT is a Solidarity-sponsored analytical journal for the broad revolutionary left. The March/April issue features the Educational Crisis in California and the Unfolding Fightback with articles by students and workers in the University of California system. For International Women's Day there are reviews on gender, sexuality and liberation by Catherine Sameh, Chloe Tribich and Kate Flynn. Other articles include Malik Miah on Obama Forgets the Black Community, Michael Steven Smith on Lost Liberties in the Age of Obama and Kim Moody on the Crisis and Potential in Labor's Wars and coverage on Honduras and Gaza.
See the latest issue...
View the archives...
Subscribe!
Write a letter to the editor...




Bright orange 1 1/2" buttons boldly demand: "Bring the Troops Home Now!" Wear one everywhere to start a conversation about why US occupation can never be a force for liberation, and people's needs should come before the massive military budget.
Produced during the massive immigrant rights demonstrations of 2006, these 2 1/8" buttons read, in Spanish and English: ¡exigimos Paz, Legalización, y Trabajos para Todos! we demand Peace, Legalization, and Jobs for All!





Obama in Irag and Afghanistan
Thanks for the remarks Dianne.
The main point I think is #3. Removing "combat troops";. but maintaining 30,000-50,000 US troops in Iraq! What do we call that? At least, it's an occupation, a permanent siege and continued assault on the Iraqi people.
That's the really amazing coup Obama has pulled of - "ending the war", merely by saying so, all the while committing his administration to the quagmires, death, and full support of US-control-of-the-Middle-East-no-matter-the-cost. Good 'ol imperialism.
A smarter-than-usual commentator pointed out that the 19-month-thing is NOT an Obama policy - in fact, it's in line with the 'status of forces' agreement negotiated between Bush and the Iraqi government! It was in place before he was inaugurated. Obama's blatantly trying to bullshit us.
It's flexible anyhow. Robert Gates, Bush's - or, excuse me, Obama's - Secretary of Defense, was asked if this remnant "counter-terrorism" force (at least 30,000!) will be allowed the "rules of engagement" of current US soldiers. In other words, can they shoot to kill Iraqi's with full direction and cover by US military command. Gates' answer - "Yes, of course". Under Obama's plan, on it's own terms, Iraq is not being turned over to Iraqi's in 19 months. It should be free now.
Should we be surprised if, say, in 2011, Obama says we need an additional 20,000 troops added to the "counter-terrrorism efforts" in Iraq, supplementing the bombing and murder being committed in Afghanistan and Pakistan? Should we be surprised if this "war" is deemed over, while US troops slaughter and are themselves killed and maimed in Iraq, Pakistan, Afghanistan...Iran? Then shame on us and our "peace" movement.