posted 02/7/12
posted 02/4/12
posted 02/3/12
posted 02/3/12
posted 01/24/12
posted 01/22/12
Published bimonthly since 1986, AGAINST THE CURRENT is a Solidarity-sponsored analytical journal for the broad revolutionary left. The January/February 2012 issue features fourteen articles on the Occupy movement, its strategies, and actions in a number of U.S. cities. ATC’s Black History feature: Paul Ortiz on C.L.R. James’ Visionary Legacy and Derrick Morrison reviews a study of the least-known slave uprising. Hisham H. Ahmed writes about the Arab Spring, the West and Political Islam and ATC interviews Atef Said on Egypt’s Unfinished Revolution. Additional reviews by Bruce Levine, Kathlene McDonald, Susan Dirr and Tessa Echeverria and Michael Löwy. Subscribe today!
I'd be interested in seeing a 4 days 9 hours
The Socialist Party has not folded 4 days 15 hours
The Obama administration and the Poor 1 week 22 min
YES! yes! YES! 2 weeks 2 days
Thank you for writing this. 2 weeks 2 days
Enter your email address and sign up for our announcement and updates list, Solidarity News. Get articles and upcoming events delivered every month.
Twitter
YouTube
Facebook
RSS Feed
email:
phone:
mail:
phone:
mail:
Solidarity depends on the generous contributions of its friends and allies to continue its work. Please consider giving!
International Viewpoint is the monthly English-language magazine of the Fourth International. IV is a window to radical alternatives world-wide, carrying reports, analysis and debates from all corners of the globe. Correspondents in over 50 countries report on popular struggles, and the debates that are shaping the left of tomorrow.
02/10/12 02:15
On February 1, 2012, Robert Fisk ended his article in the British daily newspaper “The Independent” as follows: “But there is one unasked question. Just suppose the regime [of Bashar al-Assad] did survive. Over what kind of Syria would it rule?” In other words, the revolt has reached a point of no return.
-
IV445 - February 2012
/
Syria,
Arab Revolutions
02/9/12 10:04
"Prosecute the Cabal!" With millions of on strike and crowds singing Solidarity Forever, Occupy Nigeria has shut down the most populous country in Africa. Here in New York, the diaspora is rallying in support as well, and on Saturday, Jan. 14, I went to the second rally at the Nigerian Embassy and the UN this week. Though big labor actions might be more common in Nigerian than in the US, folks are saying this one feels different. Maybe it's the wave of protest against neoliberalism around the world in 2011, maybe it's the corruption—facilitated by neoliberal deregulation — or maybe it's the high unemployment rates (over 40% among young workers), maybe it's that oil is so central to the economy; or maybe it's all of this together.
-
IV445 - February 2012
/
Nigeria,
Trade unions,
Global Justice
02/9/12 07:46
Congressman Ron Paul (R-TX) is not the typical politician. He says what he thinks and lets the chips fall where they may. He's against the war in Afghanistan and against any U.S. invasion of Iran. He points out that U.S. policy in the Middle East “has only intensified strife and conflict” and “U.S. tax dollars have militarized the entire region.”
-
IV445 - February 2012
/
USA
Order these eye-catching buttons to spread the demand for social and economic justice. If you don't have paypal, email us!
Reads Bail out People, not Wall Street!. Around the edge, these 2 1/8" buttons read "Free Health Care," "Defend Public Services," "Living Wage Jobs," "Free Higher Education," "Troops Home Now," "Rebuild the Gulf Coast," and "Affordable Housing."
Brown and black buttons demand: "Bring all the Troops Home Now!" Wear one everywhere to start a conversation about why US occupation can never be a force for liberation, and people's needs should come before the massive military budget.
These 2 1/8" buttons read, in Spanish and English: ¡Alto a las deporaciones - Legalización para todos! Stop the deportations - Legalization for all!
Obama in Irag and Afghanistan
Thanks for the remarks Dianne.
The main point I think is #3. Removing "combat troops";. but maintaining 30,000-50,000 US troops in Iraq! What do we call that? At least, it's an occupation, a permanent siege and continued assault on the Iraqi people.
That's the really amazing coup Obama has pulled of - "ending the war", merely by saying so, all the while committing his administration to the quagmires, death, and full support of US-control-of-the-Middle-East-no-matter-the-cost. Good 'ol imperialism.
A smarter-than-usual commentator pointed out that the 19-month-thing is NOT an Obama policy - in fact, it's in line with the 'status of forces' agreement negotiated between Bush and the Iraqi government! It was in place before he was inaugurated. Obama's blatantly trying to bullshit us.
It's flexible anyhow. Robert Gates, Bush's - or, excuse me, Obama's - Secretary of Defense, was asked if this remnant "counter-terrorism" force (at least 30,000!) will be allowed the "rules of engagement" of current US soldiers. In other words, can they shoot to kill Iraqi's with full direction and cover by US military command. Gates' answer - "Yes, of course". Under Obama's plan, on it's own terms, Iraq is not being turned over to Iraqi's in 19 months. It should be free now.
Should we be surprised if, say, in 2011, Obama says we need an additional 20,000 troops added to the "counter-terrrorism efforts" in Iraq, supplementing the bombing and murder being committed in Afghanistan and Pakistan? Should we be surprised if this "war" is deemed over, while US troops slaughter and are themselves killed and maimed in Iraq, Pakistan, Afghanistan...Iran? Then shame on us and our "peace" movement.