Published bimonthly since 1986, AGAINST THE CURRENT is a Solidarity-sponsored analytical journal for the broad revolutionary left. The March/April issue features the Educational Crisis in California and the Unfolding Fightback with articles by students and workers in the University of California system. For International Women's Day there are reviews on gender, sexuality and liberation by Catherine Sameh, Chloe Tribich and Kate Flynn. Other articles include Malik Miah on Obama Forgets the Black Community, Michael Steven Smith on Lost Liberties in the Age of Obama and Kim Moody on the Crisis and Potential in Labor's Wars and coverage on Honduras and Gaza.
See the latest issue...
View the archives...
Subscribe!
Write a letter to the editor...




Bright orange 1 1/2" buttons boldly demand: "Bring the Troops Home Now!" Wear one everywhere to start a conversation about why US occupation can never be a force for liberation, and people's needs should come before the massive military budget.
Produced during the massive immigrant rights demonstrations of 2006, these 2 1/8" buttons read, in Spanish and English: ¡exigimos Paz, Legalización, y Trabajos para Todos! we demand Peace, Legalization, and Jobs for All!





Comrades: Simon's argument,
Comrades:
Simon's argument, which is also Sam's, I think, that the Bolshevik 'choice' to undermine soviet democracy paved the way for Stalinism is disastrously undercut by Simon's simultaneous assertion that even if the Bolsheviks had favored soviet democracy it was still highly unlikely that this policy choice "would have greatly altered the course of Russian history” because that course was dictated by the "failure of the workers’ movements to produce revolutionary change outside Russia and the poor economic conditions existing in the country."
What is this if not a contorted way of asserting the inevitability of Stalinism -- no matter what choices "Leninism in Power" made? It is puzzling why Sam seems to think Simon's work is a break from the teleology of the totalitarian school when the LOGIC of Simon's argument is in full continuity with it, with lip-service paid to empirically 'real' but logically illusory 'choices'.
John Marot